LAPD officer testifies he found Combs with 'woman in distress' in 2016
The evidentiary phase of Sean Combs’ trial began Monday with testimony regarding when Combs was caught on hotel surveillance footage attacking his then-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura.
The first witness to take the stand was Israel Florez, an LAPD officer who was working security at the InterContinental Hotel in Century City, CA in March 2016, when he said he responded to a call about “a woman in distress” on the sixth floor.
“After I responded, when I got out of the elevator, I observed a male and female in the elevator lobby,” Florez said, adding that he recognized the male as Sean Combs.
“I seen Mr. Combs in a towel and some colored socks.” Florez said, adding that Combs gave him what Florez described as a "devilish stare,” and noted that Ventura looked “scared.”
“She was pretty much just covered up. I couldn’t see her face. She was pretty much in the corner,” Florez said. He also said he noticed that the flower vase that decorates the hallway was destroyed.
“She was saying that she wanted to get her phone, her bag, she wanted to leave,” Florez testified. At one point, he said, Combs allegedly told Ventura, “you’re not going to leave.”
Florez testified that he followed the pair back to their room and stood in the doorway. He said he noticed a “male, Black, wearing dark clothing sitting at the corner of the bed.”
Once Ventura left the room, Florez said Combs called to him. “He was pretty much holding a sack of money and he said, ‘here, take care of this for me, don’t tell anyone,’” Florez testified.
Florez said he later noticed that Ventura had a “purple eye.”
Federal prosecutors have said that Combs is seen on video “brutally beating” Ventura as she tried to escape a so-called “freak off” sex party. Defense attorneys conceded what the video depicted “is dehumanizing and violent and terrible” but said it was a fight over a phone.
Federal prosecutors have argued that the case is not about a celebrity’s private sex life. Instead, they said that “the sexual conduct at issue in this case was coercive and criminal.”






